Pages: 117-128

Interpretation of the results of the burials grouping by using statistical and typological methods is associated with difficulties in the case of an analysis of individual nomadic funerary and ritual complexes, scattered on a vast territory. Long lasting discussion about the correlation of burial groups of the Eastern European nomads of the 6 th — early 8 th century demonstrates what variety of versions can be used to explain the differences between groups: chronological, social, cultural, ethnic, or their combinations. The sum of differences between barrow burials of the Sivashovka type and rich complexes of the Pereschepina circle is very significant. But all versions, except social, cause a serious paradox — existence of an “ultrarich” cultural group of nomads or the highest nobility without any lower social strata. The second problem is the location of the richest complexes of the Pereshchepina circle on the southern outskirts of the forest-steppe, in the area of the settled population of the Penkovka culture. These facts, in combination with hoarding activity within the range of the Penkovka culture, and the cessation of its existence, is interpreted as evidence of an invasion of nomads. But they are also considered as a testimony of the symbiosis of the Slavs and nomads, up to the creation of the Slavic-nomadic state. The current situations can be mainly explained by limitations of the source base, imperfection of traditional methods and weak use of modern natural scientific methods.

Keywords: Pereshchepina culture, Sivashovka type, archaeological complex, social stratification, chronology, Northern Black Sea region

Information about author:

Oleksii Komar (Kiev, Ukraine). Candidate of Historical Sciences. Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Geroev Stalingrada Ave., 12, Kiev, 04210, Ukraine
E-mail: [email protected]